The Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance and Octopus Card System  Free Essays

The Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance and Octopus Card Systemâ â Lam Ka Chun 3035069794 The University of Hong Kong CCST9029 Cyberspace Crime: Technology and Ethics Dr. K. P. We will compose a custom article test on The Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance and Octopus Card Systemâ â or on the other hand any comparative point just for you Request Now Chow Ms. Chan Vivien Pui Shan Abstract This article is about the spillage of information of the Octopus card organization. In 2010 , Octopus offered the data of their customers to 6 organizations for advancement and made a benefit of 44 million Hong Kong dollars more than 4. 5 years . Taking into account the instance of Octopus case, this article will experience three section to consider it : specialized angle, moral viewpoint and legitimate perspective. It will likewise recommend plausible proposals. The dis-genuine organization drove a spillage of individual information: Octopus Card Company Introduction of Octopus card organization According to the insights, 95% of those between the ages of 16 and 65 have an Octopus and Octopus forms more than 12 million exchanges per day. The card is acknowledged by in excess of 100 transportation specialist co-ops and 160 retailers, including 7-Eleven, Starbucks, and Park Shop. It can likewise be utilized at pay telephones, photograph corners, and parking structures. This uncovers the octopus is ordinarily and generally utilized. Additionally inferred that the spillage of individual information impacts many individuals. Specialized Issue regarding specialized Issue, Octopus card is a battery-powered contactless put away worth brilliant card utilized generally in transportation and retail business. How might it move the cash without contact? It is on the grounds that it utilized the strategy of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID). We will go into more profound of the RFID. RFID is the utilization of a remote non-contact framework that utilizations radio-recurrence electromagnetic fields to move information from a label connected to an item, for the reasons for programmed distinguishing proof and following. The Octopus card requires no battery and are fueled and perused at short ranges by means of attractive fields (electromagnetic acceptance). The tag contains electronically put away data which can be perused from up to a few meters (yards) away. Dissimilar to a scanner tag, the tag shouldn't be inside view of the peruser and might be inserted in the followed object. RFID labels are additionally utilized in numerous businesses. A RFID label connected to a car during creation can be utilized to keep tabs on its development through the sequential construction system. Pharmaceuticals can be followed through stockrooms. Domesticated animals and pets may have labels infused, permitting positive distinguishing proof of the creature. Moral Issue regarding the moral issue, there are a couple of focuses we might want to talk about. Right off the bat it is whether there is an excessive amount of individual data required in the customer understanding. The Octopus Company was interrogated regarding if the individual data required on the customer understanding was excessively. The whiner guaranteed that the vital data required by the plan is in reality simply name and Octopus card number. Additionally, the customer understanding was not easy to understand, in light of the fact that the content was excessively little, practically incomprehensible and the entire proclamation is excessively long and ungainly. Be that as it may, then again, these days Hong Kong resident are effectively give out their data without knowing how the data will be utilized. The consciousness of security their own information is excessively feeble. It’s consistently customers’ obligation to peruse the entire proclamation regardless of how not easy to understand it is on the grounds that it ought to act naturally to ensure their own security. Lawful Issue The Octopus Card Company has really sued the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance. The organization gathered extreme individual information with the end goal of client verification and it neglected to find a way to guarantee that the candidates were expressly educated regarding the classes of people to whom the information might be moved. Additionally, the organization shared member’s individual information with outsiders for financial increases without their assent. The arrangement of information for money related increase was not explicitly expressed in the Terms and Condition. This episode has really featured the deficiencies of the current Ordinance as open desire in information security raises, particularly those related to business exercises. In this way, the legislature has revised the statute in 2012 to ensure information users’ right. Six information insurance standards: Principle 1 †reason and way of assortment of individual information Principle 2 †exactness and span of maintenance of individual information Principle 3 †utilization of individual information Principle 4 †security of individual information Principle 5 †data to be commonly accessible Principle 6 †access to individual information DPP1 and DPP3 are abused. Since the octopus organization sold the information of their customers, the reason for assortment of individual information is not the same as what the pubic idea about. Likewise, there is no immediate identified with octopus framework when the information is utilized. Along these lines, utilization of individual information is additionally disregarded. Recommendation There are four proposals which can help securing individual information. As a matter of first importance, because of the little regard for ensure their own data of the resident, the legislature ought to teach the resident to develop securing individual information. Second, enhancements can be made in the security and protection frameworks of organizations to guarantee low unintended information spillage. Third, government should make the standard stricter and more clear all together not to let the organizations get away from the law. Forward, set up a division to examine among the all the organizations to check whether there is comparative issue occurred. All in all, when our own information has been spilled, it is preposterous to expect to stop the spreading of the information. It is both, organizations, government and citizens’ duties to ensure our own information. Reference Websites: http://healthymethod. blogspot. hk/2011/06/octopus-card-outrage. html http://www. cdeclips. com/en/hongkong/fullstory. html? id=49560 http://www. octopus. com. k/octopus-for-organizations/benefits-for-your-business/en/file. html A video of RFID http://www. explania. com/en/channels/innovation/detail/what-is-rfid PDPOhttp://www. enactment. gov. hk/blis_pdf. nsf/6799165D2FEE3FA94825755E0033E532/B4DF8B4125C4214D482575EF000EC5FF/$FILE/CAP_486_e_b5. pdf Newspapers: The Standard, ‘Legco test alert in Octopus information row’ 2/8/2010 The Standard, ‘Octopus boss tight-lipped as open says time to go’ 4/8/2 010 Articles: Richard MacManus (2 September 2009). â€Å"Hong Kong’s Octopus Card: Utility Outweighs Privacy Concerns†. Step by step instructions to refer to The Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance and Octopus Card Systemâ â , Papers